The Analysis of The Zoo by Edward Albee

NAME : Fibrian Anindyawati
NIM : A320080241
Class : F


The Analysis of The Zoo by Edward Albee

1. The Characters
a. Peter : A man in his early forties, neither fat nor gaunt, neither handsome nor homely. He wears tweeds, smokes a pipe, carries horn-rimmed glasses. Although he is moving into middle age, his dress and his manner would suggest a man younger.
b. Jerry : A man in his late thirties, not poorly dressed, but carelessly. What was once a trim and lightly muscled body has begun to go to fat; and while he is no longer handsome, it is evident that he once was. His fall from physical grace should not suggest debauchery; he has, to come closest to it, a great weariness.


2. Plot Summary
There are two characters in this drama, Peter and Jerry. Jerry is desperate to have a meaningful conversation with another human being. He intrudes on Peter’s peaceful state by interrogating him and forcing him to listen to stories from his life, including "THE STORY OF JERRY AND THE DOG", and the reason behind his visit to the zoo.. The elements of ironic humor and unrelenting dramatic suspense are brought to a climax when Jerry brings his victim down to his own savage level. The catalyst for the shocking ending transpires when Peter announces, "I really must be going home;..." Jerry, in response, begins to tickle Peter. Peter giggles, laughs and agrees to listen to Jerry finish telling "what happened at the zoo." At the same time Jerry begins pushing Peter off the bench. Peter decides to fight for his territory on the bench and becomes angry. Unexpectedly, Jerry pulls a knife on Peter, and then drops it as initiative for Peter to grab. When Peter holds the knife defensively, Jerry charges him and impales himself on the knife. Bleeding on the park bench, Jerry finishes his zoo story by bringing it into the immediate present, "Could I have planned all this. No... no, I couldn't have. But I think I did." Horrified, Peter runs away from Jerry whose dying words, "Oh...my...God", are a combination of scornful mimicry and supplication.


3. Setting
It is Central Park; a Sunday afternoon in summer; the present. There are two park benches, one toward either side of the stage; they both face the audience. Behind them: foliage, trees, sky. At the beginning, Peter is seated on one of the benches.


4. The theme and The Issue
The theme and the issue in this drama are explores themes of isolation, loneliness, miscommunication as anathematization, social disparity and dehumanization in a commercial world.


5. The Language style
Jerry : He like snap to Peter and most of his language is impolite.
Peter : he did not notice what is Jerry said because he is reading.


6. The conclusion
The result of this drama is man vs. society. Because there is a conflict between Jerry and Peter, and in the last Jerry kill Peter.

The Analysis of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov

NAME : Fibrian Anindyawati
NIM : A320080241
Class : F


The Analysis of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov


1. The Characters
a. Stepan Stepanovitch Tschubokov, 70 years old, a landowner
b. Natalia Stepanovna, his daughter, 25 years old
c. Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov,35 years old, a neighbour of Tschubukov, a large and hearty, but very suspicious landowner


2. Plot Summary
Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov, a long-time neighbor of Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov, has come to propose marriage to Chubukov's 25-year-old daughter, Natalia. After he has asked and received joyful permission to marry Natalia, she is invited into the room, and he tries to convey to her the proposal. Lomov is a hypochondriac, and, while trying to make clear his reasons for being there, he gets into an argument with Natalia about The Oxen Meadows, a disputed piece of land between their respective properties, which results in him having "palpitations" and numbness in his leg. After her father notices they are arguing, he joins in, and then sends Ivan out of the house. While Stepan rants about Lomov, he expresses his shock that "this fool dares to make you (Natalia) a proposal of marriage!" This news she immediately starts into hysterics, begging for her father to bring him back. He does, and Natalia and Ivan get into a second big argument, this time about the superiority of their respective hunting dogs, Otkatai and Ugadi. Ivan collapses from his exhaustion over arguing, and father and daughter fear he's died. However, after a few minutes he regains consciousness, and Tschubukov all but forces him and his daughter to accept the proposal with a kiss. Immediately following the kiss, the couple get into another argument.

3. Setting
The Proposal is set in Chubukov’s country-house.


4. The theme and the Issue
The themes and the issue for this one act play by Chekhov that is a comedy or a satire, include making fun of romance and marriage. Chekhov examines the true nature of marriage, an institution of necessity in his. The farce explores the process of getting married and could be read as a satire on the upper middle class and courtship. The play points out the struggle to balance the economic necessities of marriage and what the characters themselves actually want. It shows the characters' desperation for marriage as comical. In Russia, marriage was a mean of economic stability for most people. They married to gain wealth and possessions or to satisfy social pressure.

5. The Language Style
Stepan Stepanovitch Tschubokov : his language is polite and humorous.
Natalia Stepanovna : she is polite at first, but she like shouting and spoiled.
Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov : he is polite and like shouting too.

6. The conclusion
The result of this drama is man vs. society. Because there is a conflict between Natalia and Ivan relater their marriage proposal. They married to gain wealth and possessions or to satisfy social pressure.